The Egg Drop Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 6 » The Egg Drop « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Snaggle
Registered user
Username: Snaggle

Post Number: 15
Registered: 7-2006
Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 12:18 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A few weeks ago I was invited to a Friday night kids bible study group, you guessed it an sda group. I wanted to keep the peace so I went along. Here's what happened...

The bible study group leader gave an illustration to the kids about God's love, the trick is called The Egg Drop. The way it works is that you setup a glass of water on the table with a bowl sitting on top of the glass, followed by a toilet paper roll and finally an egg sits atop. The goal of the trick is to get the egg into the glass of water.

Well, the teacher went on to use the trick as an illustration. The glass of water represents God's love, the egg is us, and the obstacles in the middle are 'Mr Satan'. Are you fuming yet?

The trick went like clock work as the teacher quickly smacked the bowl and sure enough the egg landed in the glass of water. So, what's the analogy? Well, the teacher said this is what we need to do to get to God's love. We need to smack 'Mr Satan' out of the way and then we can receive God's love.

I guess it is typical sda doctrine to believe that there are obstacles in between us and God's love. What a crock! I just about had to walk out before I caused a scene.

By the way here is a link that describes the trick: http://www.stevespanglerscience.com/experiment/00000084

- Mike
Grace_alone
Registered user
Username: Grace_alone

Post Number: 646
Registered: 6-2006


Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 6:21 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well Snaggle, I believe that the the "obstacles" are the SDA doctrine!


:-) Leigh Anne
Luzisbornagain
Registered user
Username: Luzisbornagain

Post Number: 28
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 8:13 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

what in the world? The SDA give satan a little too much credit and power in their doctrines. It's a shame because when Jesus resurected the bible says He rose up with all power.

(Message edited by luzisbornagain on July 06, 2007)
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 6225
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 10:39 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Mike, unbelievable. Leigh Anne's right--the obstacles are the SDA doctrines!

The idea that WE can push "Mr Satan" out of the way is preposterous. Jesus does that—Jesus has done that—and our freedom from "Mr. Satan" comes only when we are in Christ.

It's pretty depressing to realize that the same old heresy is taught to yet another generation. WE get to decide to defeat Satan. WE have to choose to push him out of the way. Have you noticed that the main focus of Adventism is not Jesus but rather fighting Satan and his endless temptations?

Adventism is truly carnal (main focus is on what to eat, drink and do), and it really gives Satan a great deal of attention.

Colleen
Reb
Registered user
Username: Reb

Post Number: 287
Registered: 5-2007
Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 12:04 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Didn't Christ already defeat Satan when He died on the Cross?

I thought "It is Finished" meant that it is FINISHED?

DO SDAs really THINK Satan still has a chance of winning. If so, isn't that terrible blashpemy?
Luzisbornagain
Registered user
Username: Luzisbornagain

Post Number: 31
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 12:56 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes they also believe that azazel the goat that is casted out of the camp that bears our sin is satan. Now that is blasphamy. But why be shocked about this when these doctrines were channeled by demons to ellen g white.

1 timothy 4:1-4 "Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;

2Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;

3Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.

4For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:"
Reb
Registered user
Username: Reb

Post Number: 289
Registered: 5-2007
Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 1:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Good points, Luz.

I am actually of the opinion that EGW's "visions" were neither from God nor Satan but the product of her medical problems.
Luzisbornagain
Registered user
Username: Luzisbornagain

Post Number: 32
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 1:07 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Or maybe a little of both. Sometimes mental problems can be taken advantage of by the evil spirits, but she sure did have an imagination though. Sounded like she was paranoid. Who knows. It's funny because my mom's side of the family have grown up adventist and they all suffer some form of schizofrenia, including my brother.
Philharris
Registered user
Username: Philharris

Post Number: 96
Registered: 5-2007


Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 8:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Reb,
While EGW's medical problems, in my opinion, had a lot to do with her "visions" don't be to quick to rule out demonic influence.

Up until I returned to the Lord at about age 27 I had three basic nightmares with one of them overcoming my thoughts awake. My point is I am beinging to think their source could have been demonic. My point is the first and second nightmares began when I was living within about three miles from Elmshaven. The third one started when we were living futher up the hill at Angwin.

The awake nightmare, even though it went away many years ago, still gives me shutters when I stop to think about it.

If EGW is the reason for my nightmares, then that is proof, to me, that demons are real and she had one.

Phil
Dennis
Registered user
Username: Dennis

Post Number: 1143
Registered: 4-2000


Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 8:20 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Reb,

Seventh-day Adventists don't want Satan out of the picture quite yet because their sins can only be blotted out by Satan himself suffering in annihilation for them. For Adventists, Satan has an important part in their atonement. All in all, according to this heresy of heresies, without the salvific role of Satan there can be no heaven for anyone. Do heresies get any worse than this?

Dennis Fischer
Jeremy
Registered user
Username: Jeremy

Post Number: 1911
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 9:21 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

You're right, Dennis. It's the worst heresy imaginable, especially when you really look at what the teaching really is according to official SDA teaching/EGW, instead of just accepting the "spin" that some of the SDA apologists try to give it.

Jeremy
Jeremy
Registered user
Username: Jeremy

Post Number: 1912
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Friday, July 06, 2007 - 9:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Reb wrote:


quote:

"Good points, Luz.

I am actually of the opinion that EGW's "visions" were neither from God nor Satan but the product of her medical problems."




Reb, I've got to go with God's Word on this:


quote:

"1The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. 2Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron. 3They forbid people to marry and order them to abstain from certain foods, which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and who know the truth. 4For everything God created is good, and nothing is to be rejected if it is received with thanksgiving, 5because it is consecrated by the word of God and prayer.

6If you point these things out to the brothers, you will be a good minister of Christ Jesus, brought up in the truths of the faith and of the good teaching that you have followed." (1 Timothy 4:1-6 NIV.)




If God says EGW was led by deceiving spirits and was taught by demons, I've got to believe it!

Jeremy
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 6242
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Saturday, July 07, 2007 - 11:48 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Very interesting observations, Phil. I believe you're right.

Dennis and Jeremy, very well said.

Colleen
Luzisbornagain
Registered user
Username: Luzisbornagain

Post Number: 42
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Sunday, July 08, 2007 - 9:10 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I remember reading somewhere out of an ellen g white quote where she forbade certain adventists from getting married and having kids because it was distracting them of the adventist cause. So the 1 timothy 4:1-4 text applies to ellen g. white perfectly when you think about it.
Jeremy
Registered user
Username: Jeremy

Post Number: 1917
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Sunday, July 08, 2007 - 12:04 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes, she also forbade interracial marriage, severely restricted sexual relations between husband and wife, spoke against having children, and even taught that people should not marry at all because it was the "last days."

And some people think she doesn't fit the "forbidding marriage" part of 1 Timothy 4!

She even taught that Jesus' words about it being like the days of Noah where people will be eating and drinking and marrying, meant that those things were sinful!! But Jesus' whole point was that those things were normal and that life would be going on as normal in the last days! So she totally fits 1 Timothy 4, by twisting Jesus' meaning to try to say that eating/drinking (wrongfully anyway, according to her definitions!) and marrying are sinful things! It's total absurdity, not to mention doctrines of demons.

Jeremy
Reb
Registered user
Username: Reb

Post Number: 298
Registered: 5-2007
Posted on Monday, July 09, 2007 - 8:55 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hmmmm she did do those things.

Maybe it was both mental illness and the other stuff you guys are saying?

It's obvious EGW WAS clinically mentally ill.
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 6261
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Monday, July 09, 2007 - 1:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Reb, brain damaged, mentally ill, and developmentally disabled people are still able to know the Lord Jesus. We have a special ministry at Trinity for mentally disabled people, and they absolutely know and love the Lord Jesus. One of their number is a former Boeing engineer who used to travel internationally and lecture at conferences.

A few years ago he was mugged in Seattle as he was traveling on a speaking engagement. He was severely brain damaged and spent several months in a coma/semi coma. He will never be the same. He is wheelchair bound, he cannot speak very intelligibly, he seems to have some cognitive dysfunction although in some respects he can still function rather well. It was after his accident as he came out of his coma that he came to know the Lord Jesus. He realized as he was slowly coming around that God had saved his life.

This man recently did a PowerPoint presentation at church that gave his story in brief, and he stated that he would not undo what happened to him because it resulted in his knowing Jesus.

Ellen's duplicity and persistent lies about God having given her her visions and surious messages cannot be written off to mental illness. Brain damage does not mean a person cannot know right from wrong.

Ellen was spiritually compromised, not just brain damaged. If we don't admit the truth about her true nature, we are vulnerable to her because we are not squarely facing the implications of the truth.

Colleen

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration