2009 SDA Ministerial Graduates Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 8 » 2009 SDA Ministerial Graduates « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
Archive through April 20, 2009Jeremy20 4-20-09  12:04 pm
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 9712
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Monday, April 20, 2009 - 4:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thank you, Dennis. I agree--amazing articles.

Colleen
Dennis
Registered user
Username: Dennis

Post Number: 1657
Registered: 4-2000


Posted on Monday, April 20, 2009 - 8:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Recently, in Uganda, a 2,000-student SDA secondary boarding school was closed due to campus rioting by the students. The students rioted (breaking many things) due to the faculty not being transparent in their dealings. The students claimed the faculty only had a form of godliness.

Dennis Fischer
Psalm107v2
Registered user
Username: Psalm107v2

Post Number: 193
Registered: 10-2008


Posted on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 - 7:06 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I see the 144 graduating as 144 too many, however, it is somewhat encouraging to see the lower numbers.

Over the past couple years I've been on some SDA discussion groups on Facebook and what has been disheartening is to see how many young people in their teens and 20s are really holding on to EGW and have her writings memorized or pulled upon as much as the Bible. When I was a teen and before my conversion to Christianity I read her daily but my loyalty was to study of truth and where she seemed to disagree with the Bible or common sense I ignored or excused EGW.

Perhaps there is something about that particular forum but there are quite a few. As a West Indian/North American it was my experience that being devoted to the SDA church and EGW were just as important culturally as our Caribbean heritage it is sad to see the number of people graduating from Oakwood (where I figured I would have attended/graduated and found my perfect SDA wife-thank God none of the above happened) and AUC (where my sister went

Alas, all I can do is pray but if God can reach a stubborn wretch like me He can reach anybody

Enoch
Psalm107v2
Registered user
Username: Psalm107v2

Post Number: 194
Registered: 10-2008


Posted on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 - 7:14 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I see the 144 graduating as 144 too many, however, it is somewhat encouraging to see the lower numbers.

Over the past couple years I've been on some SDA discussion groups on Facebook and what has been disheartening is to see how many young people in their teens and 20s are really holding on to EGW and have her writings memorized or pulled upon as much as the Bible. When I was a teen and before my conversion to Christianity I read her daily but my loyalty was to study of truth and where she seemed to disagree with the Bible or common sense I ignored or excused EGW.

Perhaps there is something about that particular forum but there are quite a few. As a West Indian/North American it was my experience that being devoted to the SDA church and EGW were just as important culturally as our Caribbean heritage it is sad to see the number of people graduating from Oakwood (where I figured I would have attended/graduated and found my perfect SDA wife-thank God none of the above happened) and AUC (where my sister went

Alas, all I can do is pray but if God can reach a stubborn wretch like me He can reach anybody

Enoch
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 9718
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Tuesday, April 21, 2009 - 4:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Actually, I also have the sense that the younger generation of Adventists (lower twenties and down) have been given a heavier diet of Adventist indoctrination than happened during, say, the mid-eighties into the nineties.

Some of the elementary Bible texts have much more intentional and detailed Adventist culture and historical figures in them than I remember them having when our sons were in elementary school.

There does seem to be (to me) a swing back toward embracing the distinctives that had been blurred or ignored for a while.

Colleen
Indy4now
Registered user
Username: Indy4now

Post Number: 475
Registered: 2-2008
Posted on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 - 3:35 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

When we were in California, my son went through 2nd grade (2001-02) there and had no church history taught to him. Out here in Indiana, when my daughter went through 2nd grade (2005-06), she was taught Adventist history. She came home talking about Bates, etc.

Also, when we first moved out here, I wanted to attend a Friday night worship at the academy which is 25 min. from me. I called ahead to get some details and the lady also told me that "tonight would be a great night for you to come... we're just finishing up a week long emphasis on EGW" well... I didn't go that night. But I think that Colleen is right that there does seem to be a "re-education" about EGW going on now.

~vivian
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 9721
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 - 12:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

A forum member who has grandchildren somewhere in central California sent me what was left of a Bible workbook from her (can't remember if it was first or second grade) granddaughter's class about three years ago. Most of the pages were torn out and turned in, but the last portion of the book was unfinished.

The exercises in the book featured a dot-to-dot drawing of Ellen and James in a buggy, a matching exercise featuring ADRA, an exercise featuring John Loughboro, and various Adventist pioneers and programs. It amazed me.

Colleen
Surfy
Registered user
Username: Surfy

Post Number: 524
Registered: 11-2007
Posted on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 - 4:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The conference vacation Bible school brochure stated specifically that EGW writings would be part of the program. That was either last year or the year before.

Poor little kids.

Surfy
Seekinglight
Registered user
Username: Seekinglight

Post Number: 100
Registered: 3-2009
Posted on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 - 5:08 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Colleen, the notion that SDAism has/had lost its historical roots is the theme of George Knight's recent book "The Neutering of Adventism". Here's the little promo video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MgXe0cNHjl8
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 9726
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 - 5:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Very interesting, Seekinglight. Knight is right, of course...but he's wrong about there being something worth defending and teaching. Of course, from an Adventist perspective, his recommendation is on target.

It really frustrates me to see people frantically trying to prop up a spiritually bankrupt system and repackaging it as something vital for the next generation. It is a shell, a corpse...there is no life in it. It serves, rather, as an inoculation against the biblical gospel.

Praise God He is responsible for convicting and drawing people out and to Himself!

Colleen
River
Registered user
Username: River

Post Number: 4629
Registered: 9-2006


Posted on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 - 6:41 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What really frustrates me no end Colleen is formers trying to prop it up.

River
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 9727
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 - 8:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Ha! Yes, River, me too!!

Colleen
Jeremy
Registered user
Username: Jeremy

Post Number: 2710
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Wednesday, April 22, 2009 - 9:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Oh, don't get me started, River!

Jeremy
Seekinglight
Registered user
Username: Seekinglight

Post Number: 101
Registered: 3-2009
Posted on Thursday, April 23, 2009 - 3:12 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Just to clarify, I wasn't trying to prop it up. Just keeping ya'll in touch with the latest tidbits of news.
Jrt
Registered user
Username: Jrt

Post Number: 328
Registered: 10-2008
Posted on Thursday, April 23, 2009 - 6:06 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Seekinglight,
I understand you weren't trying to prop it up.

I may be wrong in this, but it seems to me that George Knight has become the "champion" of the progressive side of Adventism. He is the one that "documents" EGW's "progressive" revelation. He will admit to early errors and problems in Adventism, but then he'll not go to where Adventists need to go to...repentance and a turning away from the heresies.

I have a dear friend who referred to Knight when I was sharing my "new" understandings. She asked me if I had read his books. I've read a few. She then referred to the "progressive" truth motif. And I inundated her with scripture texts and how the texts disagree with EGW. I just got a email from her last night and am praying on how to respond.

Anyways, thanks for the link seekinglight.

Keri
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 9731
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Thursday, April 23, 2009 - 9:01 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Seekinglight--I don't think we had you in mind as the "one who props up" Adventism! At least I know I surely didn't!

Keri, I totally agree with you re: Knight's stance. He's in the business of revisioning Adventism, of trying to gloss over the effects of the foundation and trying to make it lovely and warm today.

It's just a truism, however, that a broken or unstable or false foundation will not support a useable structure. Buildings with broken foundations are condemned. The building will fall if the foundation is not sound.

Colleen

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration