Bonhoeffer - Of Folly Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 8 » Bonhoeffer - Of Folly « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Bskillet
Registered user
Username: Bskillet

Post Number: 346
Registered: 8-2008
Posted on Monday, June 15, 2009 - 7:30 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I started reading Bonhoeffer's Letters and Papers from Prison, and I came across the following discussion of folly, within the letter "After Ten Years":

quote:

To deal adequately with folly it is essential to recognize it for what it is. This much is certain, it is a moral rather than an intellectual defect. There are men of great intellect who are fools, and men of low intellect who are anything but fools, a discovery we make to our surprise as a result of particular circumstances. The impression we derive is that folly is acquired rather than congenital; it is acquired in certain circumstances where men make fools of themselves or allow others to make fools of them. We observe further that folly is less common in the unsociable or the solitary than in individuals or groups who are inclined or condemned to sociability. From this it would appear that folly is a sociological problem rather than one of psychology. It is a special form of the operation of historical circumstances upon men, a psychological by-product of definite external factors.

On closer inspection it would seem that any violent revolution, whether political or religious, produces an outburst of folly in a large part of mankind. Indeed, it would seem to be almost a law of psychology and sociology. The power of one needs the folly of the other. It is not that certain aptitudes of men, intellectual aptitudes for instance, become stunted or destroyed. Rather, the upsurge of power is so terrific that it deprives men of an independent judgment, and they give up trying more or less unconsciously to assess the new state of affairs for themselves.

The fool can often be stubborn, but this must not mislead us into thinking he is independent. One feels somehow, especially in conversation with him, that it is impossible to talk to the man himself, to talk to him personally. Instead, one is confronted with a series of slogans, watchwords, and the like, which have acquired power over him. He is under a curse, he is blinded, his very humanity is being prostituted and exploited. Once he has surrendered his will and become a mere tool, there are no lengths of evil to which the fool will not go, yet all the time he is unable to see that it is evil. Here lies the danger of a diabolical exploitation of humanity, which can do irreparable damage to the human character.


This reminds me so much of what it was like in Adventism, especially the part about how it is impossible to communicate with the man himself, because he simply spouts slogans and watchwords in reply. If you have ever debated with an Adventist, this is exactly what you find.

It is so true that they are being used as tools by evil forces. We all were. One of the most eye-opening things to me was reading Truth Led Me Out by Dale Ratzlaff, and also A Theologian's Journey by Jerry Gladson. These books proved beyond a shadow of a doubt to me that the SDA leadership absolutely knows its theology is wrong, that Ellen White is not truly a prophet of God, etc., but that they still spout the slogans, and encourage the laity to do so, for their own power. The average pew-sitting Adventist becomes the fool, the dupe, the patsy of men whose lust for power is their only god.

The group-think foolishness that Bonhoeffer describes is also there: No one within the SDA church questions the basic assumptions of Adventism, testing them by the Bible. Men and women just go along with them because the crowd does so, and emotionalism and fear are the tools used to keep everyone in line with the herd.
8thday
Registered user
Username: 8thday

Post Number: 976
Registered: 11-2007


Posted on Monday, June 15, 2009 - 9:12 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

wow - great quote! This topic came up in our Sunday school yesterday. The pastor brought up Jim Jones and how everyone just followed lock step behind him all the way to death. I said that in the end, many no longer wanted to - but had lost the ability to choose because a gun was pointed at their head. It didn't start out that way. They gave up their will to someone else when it all still looked good and safe. Then someone commented that Hitler did the same thing. But then there are those that never wake up and no matter what the atrocity or contradiction - believe they are still in the right.

It's so much easier to follow, and the leaders attract us and soothe us with their facade of power, wisdom, and offering you a badge of membership into some special elite. It takes a lot of work to be responsible for your own thought processes, and additionally to submit them to Christ alone - and not the attractive schemes of men. Christ asks us to die, give up ourselves and our pride. Human nature really wants a different way.
Hec
Registered user
Username: Hec

Post Number: 284
Registered: 3-2009
Posted on Monday, June 15, 2009 - 10:33 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I guess this explains what I always doubted. How can a person like Fidel Castro, or any other dictator have so many followers. True, there are many who are forced and deceived, but there are millions who would give their life for him. It seems like it would be so easy for one of his guardsmen to just put a bullet in him and end it all even if they themselves are killed. Sometimes they commit suicide because they can't take it any longer (protecting him) Ok. if you are committing suicide so you won't have to protect him why don't you just kill him,and they will kill you. You end up dead anyways, but so does him. But they can't think of that. It's like the power is overpowering even the reason.

Could that explain why the SDA rulers has swept some issues under the rug even though they know these issues are non biblical? Could it be that they do no intend to deceive the membership, but that they themselves are "fools" and cannot do the opposite because of the power the institution wields on them? If that is the case, can we send then to jail for the crime or send then to a hospital for insanity. ( To use a court case example)

Hec
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 9996
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Monday, June 15, 2009 - 8:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Great insights from Bonhoeffer, Brent. I remember being moved and overwhelmed when I read Letters and Papers from Prison several years ago. Very thought-provoking and impacting book.

Colleen

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration