Archive through January 17, 2010 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 8 » The Adventist Mind (Continued) » Archive through January 17, 2010 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Cordurb
Registered user
Username: Cordurb

Post Number: 53
Registered: 4-2009
Posted on Thursday, January 14, 2010 - 4:34 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well said. You are right. She does not want to see this but is held tightly by what she was raised in.
Believer247
Registered user
Username: Believer247

Post Number: 97
Registered: 3-2009
Posted on Thursday, January 14, 2010 - 7:58 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Dianne, very well said. I am having a conversation by mail with one of my sisters. I am using some of your points you made in your post in my correspondence with her.

Cordurb, I am praying for your wife that the Holy Spirit will lift the veil and give her understanding. I know that with her and with my sister, the Holy Spirit is the only one who can get through to them.
Nowisee
Registered user
Username: Nowisee

Post Number: 239
Registered: 5-2009
Posted on Friday, January 15, 2010 - 3:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thank you, Dianne, for printing that letter--it is an excellent overview and is really helpful.
Asurprise
Registered user
Username: Asurprise

Post Number: 1136
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Friday, January 15, 2010 - 6:58 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Believer and Nowisee;
I'm glad that you could use what I wrote, although I cannot take the credit. I asked the Lord to help me say the right things. If it wasn't for Him, I'd still be an Adventist too! Yikes!
Indy4now
Registered user
Username: Indy4now

Post Number: 750
Registered: 2-2008


Posted on Saturday, January 16, 2010 - 9:01 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Cordurb,

I agree with Keri... I see that the core of the problem is that even though your wife believes in the "merit of Christ" ... SHE is still "responsible". I had a long passionate discussion with my cousin's husband over Thanksgiving. He believes the same thing your wife does. I am finally getting around to writing to him... let me know what you think:


quote:

Out of all that was said at Thanksgiving, the statement that troubles me most is this:

You said that "we are responsible or held accountable for our knowledge. If we are presented with a "truth" and accept it as "truth", and then we reject that "truth", we lose our salvation." (I know you said "risk" losing our salvation, but I believe that you really wanted to say we "lose our salvation". Otherwise we would not have had the discussion we had that night! What would be the point of having a passionate discussion if you only thought we had a "risk" of losing our salvation. I think that you believe that we have lost our salvation because we have rejected the "truth" about the Sabbath.)

This belief is a variance of Gnosticism. Gnosticism is a thought where people believe that knowledge, specifically having a higher knowledge will save you. Ellen White preached this a lot. In her first vision (as recorded in Early Writings in the introduction), she envisions the Advent group walking up this path towards Jesus. They are all looking towards Jesus, but the path is lit up from behind by the "midnight cry". Ellen then says that the people in that Advent group who were walking towards Jesus and had rejected the "truth" of the midnight cry, their path became dark and they fell off the path into darkness. What is the midnight cry? Obviously this is important because even though you are looking to Jesus, He is not enough to light up your path! According to her vision, you have to know this "truth" of the midnight cry so that your path has light. This is written by Ellen White whom the Adventist church wrote (in their doctrine #19) is an authoritative source of truth. If you rewrite this vision and insert "Sabbath truth", this is exactly what you believe! Your vision would be a group of Adventists walking up this path towards Jesus and their path is lit up from behind by the Sabbath truth. Those that reject the Sabbath truth, their path will become darkened and they will fall off the path… even though they had their eyes on Jesus.

In Ellen's vision, you can see that it doesn't matter that you keep your eyes on Jesus… what matters is that you haven't rejected the truth of the midnight cry. In your version of this vision… what really matters is that you haven't rejected the Sabbath truth which is lighting up your path. The Sabbath truth then becomes your Savior not Jesus. This is very dangerous ground in believing that you are held responsible for the truth you know. You are placing your beliefs above what Jesus has accomplished for you at the cross. I find it offensive!

The only knowledge that I believe we are responsible is accepting Christ as our God and Savior. Most Christians accept Christ as their God. Even the demons know who God is. So just the fact that you know that God is God is not enough. Our salvation lies in accepting Jesus as our Savior. The work He did for you at the cross is a free gift that He has given to you. His death has forgiven you of your sins, He remembers them no more, it atones you and now you can boldly come before God in prayer because of His death. If you believe in the Investigative judgment and don't know if ALL your sins are forgiven and atoned for, you can't come before God… because you don't believe that the righteousness of Christ that was given to you at His sacrifice IS ENOUGH to cover you. I believe that Christ's righteousness IS ENOUGH, He IS my Savior… by Him alone I am saved!




This belief about being "responsible" or "held accountable" is all part of the "lying spirit" of their theology. Why don't they just drive another nail into Jesus? sad... how they persecute Jesus, belittle and demean Him by their belief and they can't see that.

vivian
Christo
Registered user
Username: Christo

Post Number: 204
Registered: 2-2008
Posted on Saturday, January 16, 2010 - 9:15 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Vivian,
I like your presentation.

Chris
Flyinglady
Registered user
Username: Flyinglady

Post Number: 7836
Registered: 3-2004


Posted on Saturday, January 16, 2010 - 9:30 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Vivian, I like your presentation also.
Diana L
Indy4now
Registered user
Username: Indy4now

Post Number: 751
Registered: 2-2008


Posted on Saturday, January 16, 2010 - 9:39 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

... I just realized how I need to finish my note. I need to end it with "my" version of the vision. That I see that a group of people are on the path to Jesus, but that their path is lit up by the truth of His grace, His mercy... that He died to save sinners such as me.

vivian
Asurprise
Registered user
Username: Asurprise

Post Number: 1138
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Saturday, January 16, 2010 - 12:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Vivian, I like your letter too. In my case, when I was an SDA, I first had to see that the SDA church was wrong before I could see anything else. When I was an SDA, I loved it when the pastor gave a sermon filled with the message of "saved-by-grace." Whether he said it or not though, I always added a little "but..." to it. I could never believe I currently HAD salvation - or at least when I did convince myself of that; it was short lived. A few minutes later I couldn't be certain of my salvation.

That's something ALL the false religions have in common. The Roman Catholic says: "if I confess this to the priest, then..." A Muslim says: "if my good deeds OUTWEIGH my bad ones (of if I die blowing up an infidel), then maybe..." (they can never be certain if their good deeds REALLY outweigh their bad ones. The Bible - in Isaiah - says that people's GOOD deeds are filthy rags. ) An Adventist says: "if I make it through the investigative judgment and if I am making progress and if I ask God to forgive all my sins, then maybe..."

Only in real Christianity is there real assurance. Only in real Christianity has the whole atonement been DONE! Jesus said, "it is finished," but all the false religions ignore that.
Indy4now
Registered user
Username: Indy4now

Post Number: 752
Registered: 2-2008


Posted on Saturday, January 16, 2010 - 3:01 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Asurprise... I will definitely add that "the whole atonement is done". I'm curious to know what the first thing you saw in Adventism that was wrong.

vivian
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 10839
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Saturday, January 16, 2010 - 5:41 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Vivian, that is good. I'm really struck by your pointing out the reality of that vision: they need higher, or special, knowledge in order to stay on the path, and rejecting that special knowledge is what spells their doom. I have never seen so clearly how Ellen's vision itself demonstrated that reality.

They argue every which way, today, to say Jesus is all they need. But, as you point out to your husband's cousin, that's just words. The undercurrent is the "special knowledge" of Sabbath. Jesus is enough--unless we give up the Sabbath.

Colleen
Nowisee
Registered user
Username: Nowisee

Post Number: 245
Registered: 5-2009
Posted on Saturday, January 16, 2010 - 7:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

And, re the vision, walking up a path to Jesus is so different (works oriented just like our 'steps to Christ') from what He actually did to save us--He came down (underline) to rescue us! We didn't trudge up to Him. Didn't hike up a path that we are in danger of falling from or trudging up a staircase of many steps to reach Him. Good news!!!! (I'm a terrible hiker and would have never made it anyway, so I am grateful to Him that He came down to get me...)
Bb
Registered user
Username: Bb

Post Number: 621
Registered: 7-2004
Posted on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 5:52 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Vivian, I LOVE the letter! Every time I see someone cut through the baloney to get to the real heart of the matter, it is so refreshing! I am anxious to see the "rest of the story" if you will share the ending with us. :-)
River
Registered user
Username: River

Post Number: 5873
Registered: 9-2006


Posted on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 7:22 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The Adventist mindset, and the former Adventist mindset is a strange thing to behold for me as a never been.

The Adventist, in refusing to recognize we have a spirit, tries to communicate with God through human intellect, or believing that with our minds we can communicate with God.
Never recognizing that we have a spirit, and that spirit has a language, and can communicate with Spirit.

So…in the Adventist mindset, intellect has become a God.

Many of the former groups, having been raised in this same volatile mindset, while learning many new truths, but attempts to use those same methods learned in Adventism, to transfer this same set of methods over into new set of dogmas. This is described in first Corinthians Chapter one, and also in chapter two for starters, not to mention James 2:26, Romans 11:33.


This is an amazing thing to watch. It’s kind of like watching a train wreck. So, without the animating presence and the revelatory power of the Spirit it is nearly useless to them, and in some cases I’ve seen puts themselves in danger of offending the Holy Spirit in a bad way, and I would not want to be in that persons shoes.

So the Adventist lives off Adventism, which in my honest opinion is like living off eating grub worms, and the former Adventist chases book after book after book, always learning, and never coming to the knowledge of the truth, that intellect too, must bow the knee before almighty God.
Just sayin’…if every single thing is cast at the feet of Jesus, he will bless us, and reach down and set us up on our spiritual feet.

How is that for cutting through the baloney Bb?

Now pardon me, while I go back to my cave, pull the lid in over me, and feel sorry for myself that everybody’s after me.

Then after some days of sitting in the dark by myself cringing, and the Lord says to me, “River, what are you doing in there?”

And my only answer is, “I was afraid of these people, and I hid myself in this cave.”

Pitiful is what it is.
River
Indy4now
Registered user
Username: Indy4now

Post Number: 753
Registered: 2-2008


Posted on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 8:32 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

love that River... in recognizing Jesus as my Savior, I have to lay down even my knowledge. It isn't knowledge that saves me. However, that is how Adventism defines a "Christian". They define a "true" believer by the "truths" they know, the "truths" they keep and the "truths" they worship... rather than defining a Christian as someone who submits and casts everything at the feet of Christ.

When we humble ourselves and realize it's not about the "truths" we keep, follow, or worship... that's when we get out of the boat and walk on water to follow Christ.

... now git out of your cave! :-)

vivian
Dennis
Registered user
Username: Dennis

Post Number: 1854
Registered: 4-2000


Posted on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 10:57 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Dr. Ronald L. Numbers on EGW and Adventism

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dllCL4786E

Dennis Fischer
Asurprise
Registered user
Username: Asurprise

Post Number: 1140
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 12:06 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Vivian, the first thing was just a little thing that didn't by itself show me that Adventism was wrong. It just made me willing to look into it further and see if perhaps Adventism was wrong. It was a friend pointing out some things about "Michael the archangel." The verse that I remember having the most impact about that was Daniel 10:13 "...and behold, Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me..." "one of the chief princes?!" That didn't sound like God!

The thing that really showed me that Ellen White was a false prophet was her contradicting the Bible by saying that Jesus waited until 1844 to go into the Most Holy Place of the heavenly sanctuary. (See her book "Early Writings," chapter "The Open and the Shut Door" in that long first paragraph. "...This door [into the most holy place] was not opened until the mediation of Jesus was finished in the holy place of the sanctuary in 1844...")
Hebrews 6:19,20 very clearly says that Jesus went ALREADY into the most holy place. (And Hebrews 9:12, 25 and Hebrews 10:12)

This proved only to me that Ellen White was a false prophet. I still thought that the SDA church was the one true church. It wasn't until I found that Jesus had brought in a WHOLE new covenant - Hebrews 8:13, Hebrews 9:15-17, and found out what the old covenant was - Deuteronomy 4:13, Deuteronomy 5, that I realized that the entire church was a false church!

Dianne
Philharris
Registered user
Username: Philharris

Post Number: 1954
Registered: 5-2007


Posted on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 12:09 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Well, I took the time to watch this video.

Mr. Numbers appears, to me at least, to be riding the fence between being pro and con on Ellen White and what SDAs teach.

At least, in this video you couldn't really tell if he supported the Adventist views he was relating.

I object to his view that Adventist were, for the most part, alone in a literal interpratation of the six-day creation account up intil Henry Morris came along. This view gives Adventist's more credit than they deserve.

Fearless Phil
Flyinglady
Registered user
Username: Flyinglady

Post Number: 7837
Registered: 3-2004


Posted on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 1:00 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I have said in the past and will say again, that God used my 12 step program to get rid of the SDA cobwebs in my brain so that when God called/led me out of adventism I had no problem following Him. Then when I joined the forum, I found that what God had taught me while reading the Bible only was what other formers had learned. That is we are saved by Jesus Christ and His blood, by faith alone and no works of our own. Finally when God told me to go to the church I now attend I learned that what it teaches is what God taught me through reading the NT from Jan - May 2004. Thank you awesome God.
Diana L
Indy4now
Registered user
Username: Indy4now

Post Number: 754
Registered: 2-2008


Posted on Sunday, January 17, 2010 - 1:15 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thx Dianne~ I'm always interested in what causes that first little chink in our armor.

I watched that video too... I also couldn't tell if he supports EGW or not.

vivian

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration