Dear Adventist Friend: In the New Tes... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 1 » Dear Adventist Friend: In the New Testament nearly all Sabbath-keepers are called "unbelievers" « Previous Next »

Author Message
Max
Posted on Sunday, October 08, 2000 - 6:23 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

TO THE EARLY CHURCH CIRCUMCISION,
SABBATH-KEEPING, TITHING AND
HAM-SHUNNING WERE ALL PART OF A
SINGLE, INSEPARABLE PACKAGE.

1. The Pharisees and other Jews who were
circumcised, kept the Sabbath, paid tithe and
shunned ham were called UNBELIEVERS.

2. The Gentile Christians who were
not circumcised, did not keep the Sabbath,
paid no tithe but did eat ham were called
BELIEVERS.

3. The handful of Sabbath-keeping Pharisees
and other Jews who WERE believers tried to
force the Gentile Christians to start practicing
circumcision, Sabbath-keeping, tithe paying
and ham shunning.

4. Paul battled them to a standstill and took up
the cause with the earliest apostolic church
leadership -- headed by James -- in
Jerusalem.

5. James ruled, No, Gentile believers did not
have to. All they had to do was to follow the
Law of Noah (in addition, of course, to the
superior and perfect Law of Jesus) -- but
never ever the inferior and imperfect Law of
Moses.

6. Neither circumcision nor Sabbath-keeping
nor tithe-paying nor ham-shunning is ever
preached or taught anywhere in the New
Testament.

7. Nor is there anywhere any record at all of
Gentile converts ever beginning to practice
circumcision, Sabbath-keeping, tithe-paying or
ham-shunning .

8. By 100 AD probably well over 99% of the
church membership were Gentile BELIEVERS
did not practice these "shadows pointing to
Jesus."

Max of the Cross
Jtree
Posted on Monday, October 09, 2000 - 1:41 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Max, I took "liberty" and posted the above message, this is the RESPONSE we got from the Friends.

He said>You say an awful lot...yet offer no Scripture to substantiate your statements, is it because you have none?
Even satan knows better than that!

I do expect honesty and accuracy from those who make statements such as yours. If you cannot do
both then retract."
Max
Posted on Monday, October 09, 2000 - 5:19 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hi Joshua,

Of course you had permission, which I gave to
you a long time ago. As to the response you
(or, rather, I) got, I offer three points:

1. I offer the entire New Testament as
Scripture to substantiate my statements.

2. In many previous posts here on FAFF I have
offered a great plenty of specific Scriptural
references in honesty and accuracy. And the
Friends are welcome to visit this site and
examine them. Furthermore, I will continue to
so post -- here -- though not on other forums
at this time.

3. As Martin Luther said 550 years ago, "I
cannot and I will not retract, so help me God!"

Max of the Cross
Pheeki (Pheeki)
Posted on Monday, January 13, 2003 - 12:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I was reading this and had a question. How come before Sinai there was a distinction between clean and unclean animals given to Noah? I thought that was just for the Israelites? Please answer anyone.

Genesis 7
1 The LORD then said to Noah, "Go into the ark, you and your whole family, because I have found you righteous in this generation. 2 Take with you seven of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and two of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, 3 and also seven of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth. 4 Seven days from now I will send rain on the earth for forty days and forty nights, and I will wipe from the face of the earth every living creature I have made."
5 And Noah did all that the LORD commanded him.
6 Noah was six hundred years old when the floodwaters came on the earth. 7 And Noah and his sons and his wife and his sons' wives entered the ark to escape the waters of the flood. 8 Pairs of clean and unclean animals, of birds and of all creatures that move along the ground, 9 male and female, came to Noah and entered the ark, as God had commanded Noah.
Colleentinker (Colleentinker)
Posted on Monday, January 13, 2003 - 2:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Pheeki, I don't know exactly where the concepts of "clean" and "unclean" originated, but God did tell Noah to take more "clean" animals into the ark than unclean so they would have resources for sacrifices. Whether or not they ate the meat is not really stated.

When they exited the ark, however, God changed the human diet. In Genesis 9:3-4, God says to Noah, "Everything that lives and moves will be food for you. Just a I gave you the green plants, I now give you everthing. But you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it."

When God formed Israel, the concept of clean and unclean became important, and it definitely influenced food laws. But when the council of Jerusalem established the guidleines for Gentile Christians, it reverted back to this law God gave Noah: they were not to eat blood or the meat of strangled animals (which would contain blood). (see Acts 15)

Colleen
Susan_2 (Susan_2)
Posted on Monday, January 13, 2003 - 10:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

That text, Gen.9:3-4 is the proof text that one of my super SDA kin uses to prove we should be vegetarian. How can this be, you may ask. Well, she says that proves we should be vegetarian because no matter how long or thouroughally we cook the meat we can NEVER cook out all the blood. BTW, this relative has a good position at a SDA college as the diatition doing the menus for the folks who eat the cafeteria food.

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration