People With Disabilities Fight Regard... Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 3 » People With Disabilities Fight Regarding the Vote 2004 « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Denisegilmore
Registered user
Username: Denisegilmore

Post Number: 118
Registered: 10-2000
Posted on Tuesday, November 02, 2004 - 2:03 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Disabled Voters Targeted for Vote Challenges"

From the New York Times:

[Excerpted from below: "Among other things... the recruits
will be taught how to challenge mentally disabled voters
who are assisted by anyone other than their legal
guardians. In previous elections... bus drivers who had
taken group-home residents to polling places often helped
them vote."]

October 23, 2004

Big G.O.P. Bid to Challenge Voters at Polls in Key State

By MICHAEL MOSS
New York Times

Republican Party officials in Ohio took formal steps
yesterday to place thousands of recruits inside polling
places on Election Day to challenge the qualifications of
voters they suspect are not eligible to cast ballots.

Party officials say their effort is necessary to guard
against fraud arising from aggressive moves by the
Democrats to register tens of thousands of new voters in
Ohio, seen as one of the most pivotal battlegrounds in the
Nov. 2 elections.

Election officials in other swing states, from Arizona to
Wisconsin and Florida, say they are bracing for similar
efforts by Republicans to challenge new voters at polling
places, reflecting months of disputes over voting
procedures and the anticipation of an election as close as
the one in 2000.

Ohio election officials said they had never seen so large a
drive to prepare for Election Day challenges. They said
they were scrambling yesterday to be ready for disruptions
in the voting process as well as alarm and complaints among
voters. Some officials said they worried that the
challenges could discourage or even frighten others waiting
to vote.

Ohio Democrats were struggling to match the Republicans'
move, which had been rumored for weeks. Both parties had
until 4 p.m. to register people they had recruited to
monitor the election. Republicans said they had enlisted
3,600 by the deadline, many in heavily Democratic urban
neighborhoods of Cleveland, Dayton and other cities. Each
recruit was to be paid $100.

The Democrats, who tend to benefit more than Republicans
from large turnouts, said they had registered more than
2,000 recruits to try to protect legitimate voters rather
than weed out ineligible ones.

Republican officials said they had no intention of
disrupting voting but were concerned about the possibility
of fraud involving thousands of newly registered Democrats.

"The organized left's efforts to, quote unquote, register
voters -- I call them ringers -- have created these
problems," said James P. Trakas, a Republican co-chairman
in Cuyahoga County.

Both parties have waged huge campaigns in the battleground
states to register millions of new voters, and the
developments in Ohio provided an early glimpse of how those
efforts may play out on Election Day.

Ohio election officials said that by state law, the
parties' challengers would have to show "reasonable"
justification for doubting the qualifications of a voter
before asking a poll worker to question that person. And,
the officials said, challenges could be made on four main
grounds: whether the voter is a citizen, is at least 18, is
a resident of the county and has lived in Ohio for the
previous 30 days.

Elections officials in Ohio said they hoped the criteria
would minimize the potential for disruption. But Democrats
worry that the challenges will inevitably delay the process
and frustrate the voters.

"Our concern is Republicans will be challenging in large
numbers for the purpose of slowing down voting, because
challenging takes a long time,'' said David Sullivan, the
voter protection coordinator for the national Democratic
Party in Ohio. "And creating long lines causes our people
to leave without voting.''

The Republican challenges in Ohio have already begun.
Yesterday, party officials submitted a list of about 35,000
registered voters whose mailing addresses, the Republicans
said, were questionable. After registering, they said, each
of the voters was mailed a notice, and in each case the
notice was returned to election officials as undeliverable.

In Cuyahoga County alone, which includes the heavily
Democratic neighborhoods of Cleveland, the Republican Party
submitted more than 14,000 names of voters for county
election officials to scrutinize for possible
irregularities. The party said it had registered more than
1,400 people to challenge voters in that county.

Among the main swing states, only Ohio, Florida and
Missouri require the parties to register poll watchers
before Election Day; elsewhere, party observers can
register on the day itself. In several states officials
have alerted poll workers to expect a heightened interest
by the parties in challenging voters. In some cases, poll
workers, many of them elderly, have been given training to
deal with any abusive challenging.

Mr. Trakas, the Republican co-chairman in Cuyahoga County,
said the recruits would be equipped with lists of voters
who the party suspects are not county residents or
otherwise qualified to vote.

The recruits will be trained next week, said Mr. Trakas,
who added that he had not decided whether to open the
training sessions to the public or reporters. Among other
things, he said, the recruits will be taught how to
challenge mentally disabled voters who are assisted by
anyone other than their legal guardians. In previous
elections, he said, bus drivers who had taken group-home
residents to polling places often helped them vote.

Reno Oradini, the Cuyahoga County election board attorney,
said a challenge would in effect create impromptu courts at
polling places as workers huddled to resolve a dispute and
cause delays in voting. He said he was working with local
election officials to find ways of preventing disruptions
that could drive away impatient voters and reduce turnout.

State law varies widely on voter challenges. In Colorado,
challenged voters can sign an oath that they are indeed
qualified to vote; voters found to have lied could be
prosecuted, but their votes would still be counted. In
Wisconsin, it is the challenger who must sign an oath
stating the grounds for a challenge.

"You need personal knowledge," said Kevin J. Kennedy,
executive director of the Wisconsin State Elections Board.
"You can't say they don't look American or don't speak
English."

National election officials said yesterday that Election
Day challenging had been done only sporadically by the
parties over the years, mainly in highly contested races.
In the bitterly contested 2000 presidential election, they
said, challenges occurred mainly after Election Day.

The preparations for widespread challenging this year have
alarmed some election officials.

"This creates chaos and confusion in the polling site,"
said R. Doug Lewis, executive director of the Election
Center, an international association of election officials.
But, he said, "most courts say it's permissible by state
law and therefore can't be denied."

In Ohio, Republicans sought to play down any concern that
their challenging would be disruptive.

"I suspect there will be challenges," said Robert T.
Bennett, chairman of the Ohio Republican Party. "But by and
large, people will move through quickly. We want to make
sure every eligible voter votes." He added, "99.9 percent
will fly right by."

Challengers on both sides said they were uncertain about
what to expect. Georgiana Nye, 56, a Dayton real estate
broker who was registered by the Republicans as a
challenger, said she wanted to help prevent fraud and would
accept the $100 for the 13 hours of work and training.

For the Democrats in Dayton, Ronald Magoteaux, 57, a
mechanical engineer, said he agreed to be a poll watcher
out of concern for new voters. "I think it's sick that
these Republicans are up to dirty tricks at the polls," Mr.
Magoteaux said. "I believe thousands of votes were lost in
2000, and I want to make sure that doesn't happen in Ohio."

Democrats said they were racing to match the Republicans,
precinct by precinct. In some cities, like Dayton, they
registered more challengers than the Republicans, election
officials said. But in Cuyahoga County, where the
Republicans said they had registered 1,436 people to
challenge voters, or one in every precinct, Democrats said
they had signed up only about 300.

The parties are also preparing to battle over voter
qualifications in Florida, where they had until last
Tuesday to register challengers. In Fort Myers, Republicans
named 100 watchers for the county's 171 precincts, up from
60 in 2000. But Democrats registered 300 watchers in the
county, a sixfold increase.


James Dao contributed reporting from Ohio for this article,
and Ford Fessenden and Anthony Smith from New York.





Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration