Archive through September 08, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 4 » Baptism & Amazing Facts » Archive through September 08, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Schasc
Registered user
Username: Schasc

Post Number: 30
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2005 - 9:26 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I was talking with a friend of mine who does alot of evangelism and he mentioned that the average for retaining newly baptized members in the SDA church is @ 25%,but that Amazing Facts has a %40 rate. He told me this was because they baptized individuals that might not be ready to take all the steps (smoking, meat, etc) right away. He said that since AF worked with individuals where they were at, that this led to a higher retention rate. That comment suprised me because I had assumed that AF would be much stricter on who and when they baptized. He said that he had spent alot of time talking about this with someone at AF, so I am taking him at his word. Just wondering if you all had any ideas why AF would have a higher retention rate than the norm.
Pheeki
Registered user
Username: Pheeki

Post Number: 623
Registered: 1-2003
Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2005 - 11:27 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

What on earth is Amazing Facts (a magazine) doing baptizing people? What are they baptizing them into?
Riverfonz
Registered user
Username: Riverfonz

Post Number: 743
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2005 - 12:18 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I understand why. Doug Batchelor is a cultic leader. He has a magical effect on his followers. If you ever watch those prophecy seminars that he stages, he has his followers practically worshipping him. So he spreads his belief system very effectively, and draws more zealous supporters, who become indoctrinated into the cult mentality, and they therefore stay with the church.

Stan
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 2503
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2005 - 1:43 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Amazing Facts is an "independent" evangelistic ministry. Doug Batchelor is the current poster child for AF, and he not only does SDA evangelistic crusades around the country, but his series are broadcast on 3ABN and the Hope channel (official SDA satellite channel).

I had not heard that retention statistic, but I would guess that if they're doing individual follow up, that alone could increase retention. OTH, if they are baptizing people before the church would consider them ready, they might be able to be "Adventist" without really being "Adventist"--that would really cause them to stayówithout the accompanying guilt we "lifers" experienced when we did things we were taught were "wrong".

People who are baptized when they're "ready" have to give up a whole lot they love: bacon, jewelry, Saturday, smoking, wine--and take on a whole lot that's unfamiliar: Worthington food, cooking without meat, a prophet, not reading secular books on Sabbath, etc. I can see that those would tend to leave if their giving up is not accompanied by being born again. Those who are baptized without all the new trappings would not be burdened by all those things because to them they would seem optional.

Colleen
Jeremy
Registered user
Username: Jeremy

Post Number: 956
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2005 - 4:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

When I first read that statistic, I was thinking it would seem to be the opposite--that those who joined without knowing all of the "peculiar" things with SDAism would leave after they find out, whereas those who are totally indoctrinated and committed and into all of it would stay. And I thought AF does thoroughly indoctrinate people! Hmmm.

Jeremy

(Message edited by Jeremy on September 06, 2005)
Riverfonz
Registered user
Username: Riverfonz

Post Number: 748
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2005 - 8:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes, Batchelor does indoctrinate. It looks like I am puzzled Jeremy as you are, and it looks like I misread the original post. At hisprophecy seminars you don't see people with earrings or even wedding bands. He also hits them with Sabbathismal regeneration. Is there such a theological term?

Stan
Riverfonz
Registered user
Username: Riverfonz

Post Number: 749
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Tuesday, September 06, 2005 - 8:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes Jeremy, I am confused as well. If you go by Doug's prophecy seminars the indoctrination has started big time. If you look in the audience, you don't see wedding rings or earrings. And Batchelor teaches "Sabbathismal regeneration"! Is there such a theological term?

Stan
Schasc
Registered user
Username: Schasc

Post Number: 31
Registered: 10-2004
Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 9:57 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yeah it confuses me to............maybe it is the type of people that they are pulling in.
Jackob
Registered user
Username: Jackob

Post Number: 21
Registered: 7-2005
Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 12:13 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Sabbathismal regeneration"? What is this, I'm dead curios.
Riverfonz
Registered user
Username: Riverfonz

Post Number: 753
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 12:36 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jackob, I was half kidding but not really. Doug Batchelor, in one prophecy seminar gave a sermon based on the Titanic. He came around to the fact that all the Sunday churches were basically on he Titanic, but to be saved, then you must be with the group that keeps the Sabbath, so, it is like baptisimal regeneration, where on the "Restoration" thread we discuss the fact that some Church of Christ congregations require baptism by them to be saved. Adding something else to Christ alone is no gospel at all and according to Gal. 1:8,9 is condemned.

Stan
Derrell
Registered user
Username: Derrell

Post Number: 55
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 4:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Most of the attendees at Doug's meetings are SDAs so you wouldn't see much jewelry. Doug has a very agressive pre-seminar lead-up with Bible workers who cover the area and hold individual studies for several months. His post-seminar follow-up is also very comprehensive.

As Stan said, he is very persuasive. He could have been a grand success in sales, law, or politics.
Dd
Registered user
Username: Dd

Post Number: 539
Registered: 7-2004
Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 5:35 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Wasn't his father a very successful buisness man who was worth a great deal of money? Doesn't he come by his persuasions and successes naturally?
Derrell
Registered user
Username: Derrell

Post Number: 58
Registered: 10-2002
Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 6:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Yes and probably.
Jeremy
Registered user
Username: Jeremy

Post Number: 959
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 9:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"Sabbathismal (or "Sabbathtismal"?) Regeneration" could also refer to the teaching that you have to keep the Sabbath and be baptized into the SDA Church in order to be saved... ;-)

Jeremy
Riverfonz
Registered user
Username: Riverfonz

Post Number: 758
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 9:44 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jeremy you got it! That is what one of your favorite teachers Doug Batchelor in the final analysis teaches.(Just kidding about your favorite teacher!)

Stan
Seekr777
Registered user
Username: Seekr777

Post Number: 257
Registered: 1-2003


Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 10:03 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jeremy I have a quick question which I don't have the answer to.

Has anyone ever heard Doug Batchelor say that you must keep the Sabbath and be baptised into the SDA church to be saved? Has he ever said that those baptised into another church will be lost.

I'm just wondering since that is what I hear being said about him.

Richard

rtruitt@mac.com

Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 2512
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 10:24 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I've heard Doug Batchelor preaching the Sabbath--employing guilt, fast-paced texts used out of context, comments close to sarcasm about the Catholic church changing the day, etc. I don't remember if he actually used the words that they had to keep the day to be saved, but that was the clear message. He would appeal to the people about whether they wanted to obey the Bible or man, etc.

Colleen
Riverfonz
Registered user
Username: Riverfonz

Post Number: 761
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Wednesday, September 07, 2005 - 11:53 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

In a prophecy seminar by Batchelor from New York City, 1999, I did hear him say, or imply strongly that those who were keeping Sunday were on the Titanic and sinking. I don't know what could be clearer than that. But if you were to call his Sunday night radio talk show, and try to corner him on whether you had to keep the Sabbath to be saved, he would probably try to technically get around it in some way. But he uses double talk.
I did not sense the spirit of truth at that seminar.

Stan
Melissa
Registered user
Username: Melissa

Post Number: 1049
Registered: 7-2003


Posted on Thursday, September 08, 2005 - 9:17 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Funny you should mention 99 New York, Stan. I copied an article from the Adventist Review, 9/23/99, about that seminar in NYC. I'll quote a couple of things said that struck me, and I was very new to reading anything SDA at that time ... This was an interview article, so question is posed by interviewer, and DB responds....

"Describe for me the kind of people whose attention will be attracted by this series.

While we were in Times Square and were doing some pre-work, Gary Gibbs and I walked by the Times Square church where David Wilkerson [a well-known Pentecostal evangelist] spoke; and 3,000 people came pouring out. They had finished the service. And I thought to myself, Praise the Lord! There are people here who believe in Jesus, who read their Bibles. So, I want to reach those people! If they call me a sheep stealer, it's OK. The historic Adventist mission is to call people out of Babylon. So we want not only to get people who are secular New Yorkers, but to give the complete message to folks who may have some Christian leanings but don't know the full truth."

"We hear some Adventists telling us that the church needs to "lose the beasts," and emphasize a more relational Christianity, emphasize our commonality with other Christians. How do you respond?

You can quote me on this. I was drawn to the truth by the forthright, brave, bold presentation that our church embraces. And I don't intend to compromise the truth. I want to be as graceful and considerate and compassionate in presenting the truth as I know how to be. But I'm not going to say, "Well, we've outgrown the idea that we are a peculiar people." I still believe we are a people of prophecy. I still believe the salvational truths that we find in our old books. And I'll be preaching 'em. ... I really yearn to see Adventists not ashamed of what we believe. I think the Lord wants us to stand up and be counted for what we believe. We have a message -- well, it's not a message--I think we have the truth! And the world is looking for it. ...." From pages 10-12.

What struck me most is that people coming out of a church were not "Christians", but people who believed in Jesus and read their Bibles, had "Christian leanings". Then again, that they had a salvational message different from other churches found in THEIR old books, the truth, not something in common with other Christian denominations. That really set my red flags waving ,,,,

Ironic you should mention it, Stan.
Pheeki
Registered user
Username: Pheeki

Post Number: 633
Registered: 1-2003
Posted on Thursday, September 08, 2005 - 10:29 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Doug is a true representative of the SDAism I know and grew up in. Belief in Jesus is not enough...you must be SDA. However, when confronted with that...they do a tap dance around it.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration