Now isn't that interesting! Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 5 » Now isn't that interesting! « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Jorgfe
Registered user
Username: Jorgfe

Post Number: 154
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Saturday, February 18, 2006 - 6:17 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

This is what Ellen White claims the Lord showed her:

quote:

"The Lord gave me the following view in 1847, while at Topsham, Me. The brethren were assembled on the Sabbath.

We felt an unusual spirit of prayer. And as we prayed, the Holy Ghost fell upon us. We were very happy. Soon I was lost to earthly things, and was wrapped up in a vision of God's glory. I saw an angel swiftly flying to me. He quickly carried me from the earth to the Holy City. In the City I saw a temple, which I entered. I passed through a door before I came to the first veil. This veil was raised, and I passed into the Holy Place. Here I saw the altar of incense, the candlestick with seven lamps, and the table on which was the shew-bread. After viewing the glory of the Holy, Jesus raised the second vail, and I passed into the Holy of Holies." Early Writings, p 32 (Christian Experience and Views - http://www.earlysda.com/christexp/christian-experiences.html)




And this is what the disciple John said the Lord showed him:

quote:

"I did not see a temple in the city, because the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are its temple." Revelation 21:22 NIV




It would be interesting if National Geographic would ask Doug Bachelor how John said that the Lord showed him that there was no temple in Heaven, while Ellen White said the Lord showed her that there was.

Gilbert
Lynne
Registered user
Username: Lynne

Post Number: 302
Registered: 10-2005
Posted on Saturday, February 18, 2006 - 6:46 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think we know what the unusual spirit was.

Lynne

Dennis
Registered user
Username: Dennis

Post Number: 593
Registered: 4-2000


Posted on Saturday, February 18, 2006 - 7:59 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gilbert,

Thanks for sharing another EGW contradiction to Scripture. Indeed, Revelation 21:22 could not be clearer.

Dennis Fischer
Jorgfe
Registered user
Username: Jorgfe

Post Number: 160
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Saturday, February 18, 2006 - 9:50 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Here is a most interesting response that I just received from this post:


quote:

Yes, it is interesting. Ellen White's vision indicates a similarity with what John saw in Rev. 4 - 8, where he was shown the first apartment with the seven candlesticks (4:5), a throne (4:2), and the alter of incense (see 8:3); then he is shown the second apartment in Revelation 11:19.

He is not contradicting himself in Rev. 21:22. There he is speaking of the New Jerusalem when it descends after the millenium. The temple is related to God's adminstering of the plan of redemption. During EGW's lifetime it would exist in heaven, and there is no contradiction with it appearing in the Holy City. But after the thousand years it is not present in the Holy City according to Rev. 21:22. The plan of redemption has been accomplished.

The book of Hebrews is consistent with this Scriptural picture. Hebrews 9:23 indicates that the earthly temple was made after the patten found in heaven. This is confirmed by Exodus 25:8, 9, where Moses is instructed to make everything according to the pattern shown to him. Hebrews 9:1-11 clearly shows that there is a "more perfect tabernacle" not made with hands of which Christ is the minister. The earthly tabernacle "made with hands" had the two apartments with specific ministries associated with them. Hebrews 8 & 9 discuss the application of the two apartment ministries in both the earthly, and the heavenly settings.

Furthermore, it is interesting to note that most of Paul's discussion in Hebrews centers around terminology associated with the sancuary services related to the day of atonement. This would make the book of Hebrews to have its greatest relevance as a prophetic book speaking to those who live in the final antitypical Day of Atonement. To adopt the line of reasoning the sources you quote from use, would appear to destroy the application of the Day of Atonement service to the time period beginning in 1844. This would remove any purpose of existence for Seventh-day Adventists, and it will ultimately eliminate any significant meaning for the Sabbath as the Seal of God in the last struggle of the issues described in Revelation 13.




Gilbert
Jorgfe
Registered user
Username: Jorgfe

Post Number: 162
Registered: 11-2005
Posted on Monday, February 20, 2006 - 8:55 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I have been struggling with how to reply to the response posted above in a spirit of love.

I sense from the writer a deep feeling of panic at even entertaining the thought that somehow the points made in that last paragraph might not actually be the case. It is as though the writer has staked their entire religious experience on this specific understanding. I have many dear Seventh-day Adventist friends who are enslaved to this same understanding. Clearly they don't identify their organizational heritage as one of partnering, and working together, with the larger Body of Christ to fulfil the Gospel commission. It is so sad.

Do any of you have any thoughts on how to even begin a Spirit-lead dialog that would bring the writer to an understanding of the good news of the gospel as presented in the Bible?

Gilbert
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 3418
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Monday, February 20, 2006 - 8:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gilbert, I don't know any way to have a productive dialogue with a person such as the one who wrote the above post. Unless they are open to knowing Biblical truth, their loyalty to Ellen White will obscure reality.

Sigh.

Colleen
Patriar
Registered user
Username: Patriar

Post Number: 213
Registered: 3-2005
Posted on Monday, February 20, 2006 - 9:51 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Gilbert:

Colleen is right. It is only by the work of the Spirit that a heart that closed and veiled will be able to see Truth. That kind of intellectual dishonesty is painful, I know. But we will pray and in God's timing, all He intends will be accomplished.

I would suggest a simple 'thank you' for taking the time to respond to that person. Debate will get you nowhere...I am speaking from experience unfortunately. I believe the most powerful witness is that of a changed life.

Patria
Brian3
Registered user
Username: Brian3

Post Number: 33
Registered: 8-2005
Posted on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - 10:16 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

"To adopt the line of reasoning the sources you quote from use, would appear to destroy the application of the Day of Atonement service to the time period beginning in 1844. This would remove any purpose of existence for Seventh-day Adventists, and it will ultimately eliminate any significant meaning for the Sabbath as the Seal of God in the last struggle of the issues described in Revelation 13."

BINGO! We have a winner!
Jeremy
Registered user
Username: Jeremy

Post Number: 1101
Registered: 10-2004


Posted on Tuesday, February 21, 2006 - 11:27 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Hehe, I was thinking along those same lines, Brian3. When I read that, I thought, "Exactly!" It seems that the person who wrote that thinks that Adventism just can't be wrong! It's pretty sad, actually. I also noticed that they think they "know" that Paul wrote the book of Hebrews--since EGW says he did. But Hebrews 2:3 seems to indicate that Paul did not write the book, since Paul says that he got his gospel directly from Jesus and not from people.

"how will we escape if we neglect so great a salvation? After it was at the first spoken through the Lord, it was confirmed to us by those who heard," (Hebrews 2:3 NASB.)

Compare that to what Paul said:

"For I would have you know, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man. For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ." (Galatians 1:11-12 NASB.)

Jeremy

(Message edited by Jeremy on February 21, 2006)

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration