Matthew 10:23 Help request. Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Edit Profile

Former Adventist Fellowship Forum » ARCHIVED DISCUSSIONS 6 » Matthew 10:23 Help request. « Previous Next »

  Thread Last Poster Posts Pages Last Post
  Start New Thread        

Author Message
Jim02
Registered user
Username: Jim02

Post Number: 142
Registered: 5-2007
Posted on Friday, July 13, 2007 - 9:28 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Can anyone help me understand Matthew 10:23
23When you are persecuted in one place, flee to another. I tell you the truth, you will not finish going through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man comes.

It is the latter part that is confusing me.
I have read that it refers to the destruction of Jerusalem AD70. Do you agree?
This is an example of a play on words.

(Message edited by jim02 on July 13, 2007)
Asurprise
Registered user
Username: Asurprise

Post Number: 30
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Friday, July 13, 2007 - 12:47 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Here's something that the friend who (with the Lord's help) led me out of Adventism. Thank you Phil for the instructions for copying and pasting :-)
Quote: The Bible I have here at work doesn’t really shed much light on this it says… This difficult verse has been variously interpreted as referring to His coming in
1. the transfiguration
2. Pentecost
3. The destruction of Jerusalem A.D. 70 as coming judgment
4. The second coming the cities of Israel meaning the dispersed population of Israel
5. or Jesus was simply saying I will see you later.

I like the forth explanation the best as if means to flee from city to city - the people of Israel were dispersed and did not have cities in Israel any more but established cities all over the world. Persecution of the Israelites will not end until Jesus returns The Jews have been forced from their home = persecuted for two thousand years the devil hates them and they will have to flee from city to city until the Lord returns.

I hope this helps.
Asurprise
Registered user
Username: Asurprise

Post Number: 31
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Friday, July 13, 2007 - 1:12 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The 4th suggestion makes the most sense to me too, because Israel did disperse. Also most of that nation rejected the gospel, making it difficult to witness to them. It's still trememdously difficult to witness to the people of Israel. It would be wonderful if that changed and the gospel spread like wildfire throughout their whole country!
Dianne
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 6288
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Friday, July 13, 2007 - 3:27 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Actually, that explanation makes the most sense to me, too. It is a difficult text, but it makes the most sense in terms of dispersed Israel and things still to come to pass.


Colleen
Dennis
Registered user
Username: Dennis

Post Number: 1153
Registered: 4-2000


Posted on Friday, July 13, 2007 - 7:37 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Jim,

In his classic book, THE HARD SAYINGS OF JESUS, F. F. Bruce devotes an entire chapter (#25) to Matthew 10:23. He concludes by saying that "it would be unwise to say" that the fall of Jerusalem "was the coming of the Son of man of which Jesus spoke." Dr. Bruce further adds, "that the evangelisation of Israel will not be completed before the end of the present age, which comes with the advent of the Son of man."

Dennis Fischer
Jim02
Registered user
Username: Jim02

Post Number: 143
Registered: 5-2007
Posted on Saturday, July 14, 2007 - 6:39 am:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

All of you are so helpful. FAF is a gold mine !

Thanks, Jim
Mwh
Registered user
Username: Mwh

Post Number: 634
Registered: 4-2006


Posted on Saturday, July 21, 2007 - 3:28 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Maybe the passage refers to Jews being persecuted in Israel in the last days, because they refuse to worship the Antichrist.

Jesus is wonderful,
Martin
Brian3
Registered user
Username: Brian3

Post Number: 119
Registered: 8-2005
Posted on Saturday, July 21, 2007 - 9:38 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

I think the language of the Lord coming on clouds would have had special meaning and they would have understood Christ coming in Judgement. Which leads me to 70 A.D.

Isaiah 19:1-4 HCSB An oracle against Egypt: Look, the LORD rides on a swift cloud and is coming to Egypt. Egypt's idols will tremble before Him, and Egypt's heart will melt within it. (2) I will provoke Egypt against Egypt; each will fight against his brother and each against his friend, city against city, kingdom against kingdom. (3) Egypt's spirit will be disturbed within it, and I will frustrate its plans. Then they will seek idols, ghosts, spirits of the dead, and spiritists. (4) I will deliver Egypt into the hands of harsh masters, and a strong king will rule it. This is the declaration of the Lord GOD of Hosts.

Matthew 10:23 HCSB When they persecute you in one town, escape to another. For I assure you: You will not have covered the towns of Israel before the Son of Man comes.

Matthew 24:30-34 HCSB "Then the sign of the Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the peoples of the earth will mourn; and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. (31) He will send out His angels with a loud trumpet, and they will gather His elect from the four winds, from one end of the sky to the other. (32) "Now learn this parable from the fig tree: As soon as its branch becomes tender and sprouts leaves, you know that summer is near. (33) In the same way, when you see all these things, recognize that He is near--at the door! (34) I assure you: This generation will certainly not pass away until all these things take place.
Dennis
Registered user
Username: Dennis

Post Number: 1172
Registered: 4-2000


Posted on Sunday, July 22, 2007 - 12:33 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

The following commentary is very helpful:

quote:

Matthew, writing his Gospel probably a short time after the destruction of the temple, could see, as Mark naturally could not, the separation in time between that event and the coming of the Son of man. For Matthew, the one event had taken place, while the other was still future. He rewords the disciples' question to Jesus so that it refers to both events distinctly and explicitly. Jesus, as in Mark, foretells how not one stone of the temple will be left standing on another, and the disciples say, 'Tell us, (a) when will these things be, and (b) what will be the sign of your coming and of the close of the age?' (Matt.24:3). Then, at the end of the following discourse, Jesus answers their twofold question by saying that (a) 'this generation will not pass away till all THESE THINGS take place' (Matt.24:34) while, (b)with regard to his coming and 'the close of the age', he tells them that 'of THAT day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only'(Matt.24:36). The distinction between the two predictions is clear in Matthew, for whom the earlier of the two predicted events now lay in the past; but it was already implicit, though not so clear, in Mark. [Excerpt from F. F. Bruce, THE HARD SAYINGS OF JESUS, pp. 229-230]




Dennis Fischer
Colleentinker
Registered user
Username: Colleentinker

Post Number: 6363
Registered: 12-2003


Posted on Sunday, July 22, 2007 - 9:40 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Thank you, Dennis. That is helpful.

Colleen
Brian3
Registered user
Username: Brian3

Post Number: 120
Registered: 8-2005
Posted on Sunday, July 22, 2007 - 10:26 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

My biggest problem with the meaning of Matthew 10:23 being stretched to the future is the context.
Who is the “You” in the verse?

Matthew 10:1-5 HCSB Summoning His 12 disciples, He gave them authority over unclean spirits, to drive them out and to heal every disease and sickness. (2) These are the names of the 12 apostles: First, Simon, who is called Peter, and Andrew his brother; James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother; (3) Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James the son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus; (4) Simon the Zealot, and Judas Iscariot, who also betrayed Him. (5) Jesus sent out these 12 ...

Matthew 10:23 HCSB When they persecute you in one town, escape to another. For I assure you: You will not have covered the towns of Israel before the Son of Man comes.
Emr
Registered user
Username: Emr

Post Number: 4
Registered: 7-2007
Posted on Thursday, July 26, 2007 - 3:57 pm:   Edit PostDelete PostPrint Post   Move Post (Moderator/Admin Only)

Matthew 10:23 isn't the only NT passage speaking about a looming Parousia in the lifetime of the disciples. As a matter of fact, the very notion of imminence is the norm, not the exception. Simply remember Jesús' indication that 'this generation'' would not pass before the fulfilment of his predictions came to pass, or the warning to the evil Jewish judges who partook in the mockery of a trial he was subjected to. Of course, the same thing is repeated by John the Revelator when he says that every eye will see Jesus on his Parousia, including those who pierced him.

Actually, much of the book of Revelation, so intimately connected with the notion of the end times in Adventist parlance, is said by its inspired author to be about things that were going to happen 'soon' at the time it was written. Besides, the indications given in the book about the main actors in the drama –the harlot city where the blood of the prophets was found, the seven-hilled city where the seven-headed beast ruled and one of whose heads had recently been fatally wounded– seem to speak of the geopolitics of AD 69, immediately following Nero's demise and in the first few months of Vespasian's emperorship. The harlot city of Jerusalem was destroyed shortly afterwards, of course.

Naturally, all these considerations take us to the debated realm of Preterism, whether full or partial/conditional.

Eduardo

Add Your Message Here
Posting is currently disabled in this topic. Contact your discussion moderator for more information.

Topics | Last Day | Last Week | Tree View | Search | Help/Instructions | Program Credits Administration